Rosc. Am. 33.1Videō igitur causās esse permultās quae istum impellerent;I see, then, that there are very many motives which might have driven that man; Rosc. Am. 33.1videāmus nunc ecquae facultās suscipiendī maleficī fuerit.let us now see whether there was any opportunity of undertaking the crime. Rosc. Am. 33.1Vbi occīsus est Sex. Roscius?Where was Sextus Roscius killed? Rosc. Am. 33.1— Rōmae.— At Rome. Rosc. Am. 33.1— Quid?— Well? Rosc. Am. 33.1tū, T. Roscī, ubi tunc erās?you, Titus Roscius, where were you then? Rosc. Am. 33.1— Rōmae.— At Rome. Rosc. Am. 33.1Vērum quid ad rem?But what has that to do with it? Rosc. Am. 33.1et aliī multī.so were many others. Rosc. Am. 33.1— Quasi nunc id agātur quis ex tantā multitūdine occīderit, ac nōn hoc quaerātur, eum quī Rōmae sit occīsus utrum vērī similius sit ab eō esse occīsum quī adsiduus eō tempore Rōmae fuerit, an ab eō quī multīs annīs Rōmam omnīnō nōn accesserit.— As if the question now were which of so great a multitude killed him, and not rather this: whether it is more probable that a man killed at Rome was killed by one who was constantly at Rome at that time, or by one who for many years had not come near Rome at all.
Rosc. Am. 33.93Age nunc cēterās quoque facultātēs cōnsīderēmus.Come now, let us consider the other opportunities too. Rosc. Am. 33.93Erat tum multitūdō sīcāriōrum, id quod commemorāvit Erucius, et hominēs impūne occīdēbantur.There was at that time a multitude of assassins, as Erucius mentioned, and men were killed with impunity. Rosc. Am. 33.93Quid?Well? Rosc. Am. 33.93ea multitūdō quae erat?of whom did that multitude consist? Rosc. Am. 33.93Opīnor, aut eōrum quī in bonīs erant occupātī, aut eōrum quī ab eīs condūcēbantur ut aliquem occīderent.Either, I suppose, of those who were busy with confiscated estates, or of those who were hired by them to kill someone. Rosc. Am. 33.93Sī eōs putās quī aliēnum appetēbant, tū es in eō numerō quī nostrā pecūniā dīves es;If you mean those who were grasping at others' property, you are among them, you who are rich on our money; Rosc. Am. 33.93sīn eōs quōs quī leviōre nōmine appellant percussōrēs vocant, quaere in cuius fidē sint et clientēlā;if you mean those whom people who use a milder name call 'hit-men', ask under whose protection and patronage they are; Rosc. Am. 33.93mihi crēde, aliquem dē societāte tuā reperiēs;believe me, you will find someone from your partnership; Rosc. Am. 33.93et, quicquid tū contrā dīxeris, id cum dēfēnsiōne nostrā contenditō;and whatever you say in reply, compare it with our defence; Rosc. Am. 33.93ita facillimē causa Sex. Roscī cum tuā cōnferētur.in this way the case of Sextus Roscius will most easily be set against yours.
Rosc. Am. 33.94Dīcēs: "Quid posteā, sī Rōmae adsiduus fuī?"You will say: 'What of it, if I was constantly in Rome?' Rosc. Am. 33.94Respondēbō: "At ego omnīnō nōn fuī."I shall answer: 'But I was not there at all.' Rosc. Am. 33.94— Fateor mē sectōrem esse, vērum et aliī multī.— I admit I am a buyer of confiscated property, but so are many others. Rosc. Am. 33.94— At ego, ut tūte arguis, agricola et rūsticus.— But I, as you yourself allege, am a farmer and a countryman. Rosc. Am. 33.94— Nōn continuō, sī mē in gregem sīcāriōrum contulī, sum sīcārius.— It does not follow that if I joined a gang of assassins, I am an assassin. Rosc. Am. 33.94— At ego profectō quī nē nōvī quidem quemquam sīcārium longē absum ab eius modī crīmine.— But I, who do not even know any assassin, am surely far removed from a charge of that kind. Rosc. Am. 33.94Permulta sunt quae dīcī possunt quā rē intellegātur summam tibi facultātem fuisse maleficī suscipiendī;There are very many things that could be said to show that you had every opportunity of undertaking the crime; Rosc. Am. 33.94quae nōn modo idcircō praetereō quod tē ipsum nōn libenter accūsō vērum eō magis etiam quod, sī dē illīs caedibus velim commemorāre quae tum factae sunt istā eādem ratiōne quā Sex. Roscius occīsus est, vereor nē ad plūrīs ōrātiō mea pertinēre videātur.which I pass over not only because I do not like accusing you, but even more because, if I wanted to recall those murders committed at that time in the same way as Sextus Roscius was killed, I fear my speech might seem to concern more people.