Rosc. Am. 37.1Quaeritur etiam nunc quis eum nūntium mīserit?Is it still asked who sent that messenger? Rosc. Am. 37.1nōnne perspicuum est eundem quī Ameriam?is it not clear that it was the same man who sent one to Ameria? Rosc. Am. 37.1Cūrat Chrȳsogonus ut eius bona vēneant statim;Chrysogonus sees to it that his property is sold at once; Rosc. Am. 37.1quī nōn nōrat hominem aut rem.he who knew neither the man nor his affairs. Rosc. Am. 37.1At quī eī vēnit in mentem praedia concupīscere hominis ignōtī quem omnīnō numquam vīderat?But how did it come into his mind to covet the estates of an unknown man whom he had never seen at all? Rosc. Am. 37.1Solētis, cum aliquid huiusce modī audīstis, iūdicēs, continuō dīcere: "Necesse est aliquem dīxisse mūnicipem aut vīcīnum;When you hear of anything of this kind, gentlemen, you are accustomed to say at once: 'Someone from the town or a neighbour must have told him; Rosc. Am. 37.1eī plērumque indicant, per eōs plērīque prōduntur."it is they who generally inform, and through them that most men are betrayed.' Rosc. Am. 37.1Hīc nihil est quod suspīciōne occupētis.Here there is nothing for you to seize upon by suspicion.
Rosc. Am. 37.106Nōn enim ego ita disputābō: "Vērī simile est Rosciōs istam rem ad Chrȳsogonum dētulisse;For I shall not argue thus: 'It is likely that the Roscii reported the matter to Chrysogonus; Rosc. Am. 37.106erat enim eīs cum Chrȳsogonō iam anteā amīcitia;for they already had a friendship with Chrysogonus before; Rosc. Am. 37.106nam cum multōs veterēs ā maiōribus Rosciī patrōnōs hospitēsque habērent, omnīs eōs colere atque observāre dēstitērunt ac sē in Chrȳsogonī fidem et clientēlam contulērunt."for though the Roscii had many old patrons and hosts inherited from their ancestors, they ceased to cultivate and attend to all of them, and placed themselves under the protection and clientship of Chrysogonus.' Rosc. Am. 37.107Haec possum omnia vērē dīcere, sed in hāc causā coniectūrā nihil opus est;All this I can say truthfully, but in this case there is no need of conjecture; Rosc. Am. 37.107ipsōs certō sciō nōn negāre ad haec bona Chrȳsogonum accessisse impulsū suō.I know for certain that they themselves do not deny that Chrysogonus went after this property at their instigation. Rosc. Am. 37.107Sī eum quī indicī causā partem accēperit oculīs cernētis, poteritisne dubitāre, iūdicēs, quī indicārit?If you see with your eyes the man who received a share as the price of informing, will you be able to doubt, gentlemen, who informed?
Rosc. Am. 37.107Quī sunt igitur in istīs bonīs quibus partem Chrȳsogonus dederit?Who, then, are those in that property to whom Chrysogonus has given a share? Rosc. Am. 37.107Duo Rosciī.The two Roscii. Rosc. Am. 37.107Num quisnam praetereā?Anyone else besides? Rosc. Am. 37.107Nēmō est, iūdicēs.No one, gentlemen. Rosc. Am. 37.107Num ergō dubium est quīn eī obtulerint hanc praedam Chrȳsogonō quī ab eō partem praedae tulērunt?Can there be any doubt, then, that this plunder was offered to Chrysogonus by those who took a share of the plunder from him? Rosc. Am. 37.108Age nunc ex ipsīus Chrȳsogonī iūdiciō Rosciōrum factum cōnsīderēmus.Come now, let us consider what the Roscii did in the light of Chrysogonus' own judgement. Rosc. Am. 37.108sī nihil in istā pugnā Rosciī quod operae pretium esset fēcerant, quam ob causam ā Chrȳsogonō tantīs praemiīs dōnābantur?if in that fight the Roscii had done nothing worth the effort, why were they presented by Chrysogonus with such great rewards? Rosc. Am. 37.108sī nihil aliud fēcērunt nisi rem dētulērunt, nōnne satis fuit eīs grātiās agī, dēnique, ut perlīberāliter agerētur, honōris aliquid habērī?if they did nothing else but report the matter, was it not enough for thanks to be given them, or at most, to treat them very generously, for some honour to be paid them?
Rosc. Am. 37.108Cūr tria praedia tantae pecūniae statim Capitōnī dantur?Why are three estates of such value given at once to Capito? Rosc. Am. 37.108cūr quae reliqua sunt iste T. Roscius omnia cum Chrȳsogonō commūniter possidet?why does that Titus Roscius possess all the rest in common with Chrysogonus? Rosc. Am. 37.108Nōnne perspicuum est, iūdicēs, hās manubiās Rosciīs Chrȳsogonum rē cognitā concessisse?Is it not clear, gentlemen, that Chrysogonus, once he had learned the facts, granted these spoils to the Roscii?